By: Jordan Gerheim, CEO – Outside Chief Legal LLC
5 contract mistakes Alabama business owners make
5 Contract Mistakes Gulf Coast Business Owners Make (And What Each One Actually Costs)
A handshake still means something along the Gulf Coast. But when a business relationship goes sideways, the handshake disappears and the contract is all that is left. For many small and mid-size businesses in Mobile and Baldwin County, that moment reveals a problem they did not know they had.
These are the five contract mistakes that come up most often, written in plain terms with real consequences attached to each one.
Mistake 1: Using a Template You Found Online Without Reviewing It
Free contract templates are everywhere, and some of them are reasonably well written for a generic situation. The problem is that a generic situation is rarely your situation. A template drafted for a service business in California may include terms that conflict with Alabama law, miss protections that matter for your specific industry, or include clauses that actually work against you without being obvious about it.
A Gulf Coast marketing agency used a client services agreement they pulled from a legal template site and used it for two years without modification. When a client disputed the scope of work and refused to pay the final invoice, the agency discovered the template’s dispute resolution clause required arbitration in a state they had never operated in. The clause was buried on page four. Enforcing the contract cost more than the invoice was worth.
Reviewing a template before you use it, and adjusting it to reflect Alabama law and your actual business terms, is the difference between a contract that protects you and one that just looks like it does. That review does not need to happen every time you use the agreement. It needs to happen once, done correctly, before you rely on it.
Mistake 2: Leaving the Scope of Work Vague
Contracts that describe the work in general terms feel friendly and flexible at the time of signing. They become expensive when a client or vendor has a different memory of what was agreed to.
A Gulf Coast construction subcontractor signed an agreement to handle “all electrical work” on a commercial renovation. The general contractor later claimed that phrase included work the subcontractor had never priced and never intended to do. The subcontractor completed the job under protest to avoid a breach claim, then spent months trying to recover the difference. A few additional sentences describing exactly what was included and what was excluded would have prevented the entire dispute.
Scope of work language should be specific enough that both parties would describe the job the same way six months after signing. If there is any room for interpretation, the contract needs more detail. Deliverables, timelines, exclusions, and change order procedures are all worth spelling out while the relationship is still in a good place.
Mistake 3: No Payment Terms or Weak Ones
A contract that describes the work without specifying when and how payment is due leaves a significant gap. Without clear payment terms, a business owner has limited leverage when invoices go unpaid and limited options when they need to escalate.
Strong payment terms include the amount due, the schedule, the method of payment, what triggers each payment, and what happens when a payment is late. That last part matters more than most business owners realize. A Gulf Coast event production company had a client who consistently paid 60 to 90 days late. Their contract said payment was due “upon completion” with no late fee provision. They had no contractual basis to charge interest, no agreed timeline to enforce, and no mechanism to pause future work while invoices were outstanding. Adding a net-30 term, a late fee, and a right to suspend services for nonpayment would have changed the dynamic entirely and likely changed the client’s payment behavior along with it.
Mistake 4: No Termination Clause
Every business relationship has the potential to end, and a contract that does not address how it ends creates problems in both directions. Without a termination clause, neither party knows what rights they have if they want out, what notice is required, or what obligations survive the end of the relationship.
A Gulf Coast consulting firm signed a one-year services agreement with no termination provision. Three months in, the client’s business circumstances changed and it wanted to exit the relationship. Because the contract had no termination clause, the parties spent weeks negotiating an exit that could have been handled by a short provision. The consulting firm ultimately accepted less than it was owed to avoid a dispute that would have cost more in time and goodwill than the remaining balance.
A clear termination clause defines the notice period, the circumstances under which either party can exit, what payment is owed through the termination date, and what happens to any work in progress. It is one of the shortest provisions in a well‑drafted agreement and one of the most valuable when things do not go as planned.
Mistake 5: Signing the Other Party’s Contract Without Reading It
When a larger client or vendor sends their standard contract for signature, the assumption is often that it is routine and does not need close review. That assumption is one of the most costly ones a business owner can make.
The other party’s contract is written to protect the other party. It may include indemnification clauses that shift liability onto you for things outside your control, intellectual property provisions that assign ownership of your work product to the client, limitation of liability caps that protect them but not you, and auto-renewal terms that lock you in for another year with no action required on their part.
A Gulf Coast technology services firm signed a vendor agreement sent by a large national client without reviewing it carefully. The agreement included an indemnification clause that required the firm to cover the client’s legal costs in any dispute, regardless of who was at fault. When a dispute arose two years later, the firm faced a situation where winning would still cost it significantly in legal fees. Reading the contract before signing, and pushing back on the problematic clause, would have taken a few hours. The alternative took much longer and cost considerably more.
Every contract sent to you for signature is a starting point for a conversation, not a final document. Knowing what to look for, and what to push back on, is a skill that pays for itself quickly.
A Practical Next Step
None of these mistakes require a complicated fix. Most of them are addressed by having someone review your standard agreements once, updating a few key provisions, and building a habit of reading contracts carefully before you sign them.
If your business is at a point where contracts are a regular part of how you operate, a Risk-Free Strategy Session with OCL is a useful starting point. We look at the agreements you are currently using, identify the gaps, and give you a clear picture of what your contracts are actually saying versus what you think they say.
Book your session at outsidechieflegal.com.
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Our Corporate/Business Counsel Services
Outside Chief Legal LLC is a modern, forward-thinking law firm serving as fractional chief legal officers and outside general counsel for businesses and their owners. With over 200 years of combined litigation, in-house, general counsel, and administrative legal experience, the firm delivers approachable, comprehensive counsel that blends legal expertise with practical business insight to help clients navigate ownership complexities with confidence. OCL is a trusted partner for founders, business owners, and leadership teams nationwide. Learn more about our firm, meet our team, or schedule a Risk-Free Strategy Session to talk with an attorney about how we can help your company.
