Summary
Alabama's new privacy law changes the answer for many Gulf Coast businesses. Here is whether your website needs a privacy policy now and what it needs to cover.
By: Jordan Gerheim, CEO – Outside Chief Legal LLC
The question of whether someone is an independent contractor or an employee is one of the most consequential legal decisions a Gulf Coast business owner makes, and it is often made without anyone recognizing it as a decision at all. A business hires someone to do work, pays them regularly, and calls them a contractor because that is what both parties agreed to. The legal test does not care what you called them.
The Test Is About Control, Not the Agreement
The IRS and the Department of Labor both look at the actual working relationship, not what the contract says. The core question is whether the business controls how the work is done, not just the result. A worker who sets their own hours, uses their own tools, works for multiple clients, and has real risk of profit or loss looks like a contractor. A worker who shows up on your schedule, uses your equipment, works exclusively for you, and has their work directed by your supervisors looks like an employee, regardless of what the agreement calls them.
The IRS applies a three‑category analysis covering behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship between the parties. Behavioral control looks at whether the business directs how the worker performs tasks. Financial control looks at whether the worker has a real opportunity for profit or loss and whether they have invested in their own tools or facilities. The type‑of‑relationship category examines whether there is a written contract, whether benefits are provided, and whether the relationship is permanent or project‑based.
Alabama also has its own classification standards for workers’ compensation and unemployment purposes, and the factors overlap but are not identical to the federal test. Getting this right requires looking at both the federal and state frameworks, because a worker can be correctly classified under one and misclassified under the other.
What Misclassification Actually Costs
A business that has been paying someone as a contractor for two years while directing their work, integrating them into daily operations, and treating them practically as a full‑time staff member may have a significant misclassification problem. The cost of that problem, if it surfaces through a Department of Labor audit or a worker complaint, includes back payroll taxes, penalties, interest, and potential liability for benefits the worker should have received.
The penalties are not abstract. The IRS can assess 1.5 percent of wages paid for failure to withhold income taxes, 40 percent of the FICA taxes that should have been withheld from the worker, and 100 percent of the employer’s share of FICA taxes. State penalties in Alabama for unemployment and workers’ compensation misclassification add to that total. For a business that has paid a misclassified worker $60,000 per year over two years, the combined federal and state exposure can reach tens of thousands of dollars before attorney fees.
The most common scenario on the Gulf Coast right now involves businesses that expanded during periods of growth by adding contractors rather than employees. The arrangement made operational sense at the time. But over months and years, the day‑to‑day reality of the relationship shifted toward employment while the paperwork did not.
A concrete example: a Mobile‑based marketing agency brought on a designer as a contractor three years ago for a specific campaign. The project was well‑defined, the designer had other clients, and the arrangement clearly qualified as a contractor relationship at the time. Over the following two years, that designer became the agency’s primary creative resource, worked exclusively for them five days a week, used agency software and equipment, and attended internal team meetings. The contract still said independent contractor. The working relationship said employee. When the designer filed for unemployment after the agency reduced its workload, the state conducted a review. The agency owed back unemployment taxes, interest, and penalties covering the entire period the relationship had shifted.
The Practical Difference in the Relationship
A true independent contractor relationship has specific characteristics. The contractor controls how the work is done, not just the result. They supply their own tools or equipment. They have multiple clients and are not economically dependent on your business alone. They have a defined scope of work with a beginning and an end. They invoice you for services rather than receiving a paycheck on your schedule.
An employee relationship looks different. The business controls the method and manner of work. The worker is integrated into the daily operations of the business. The business supplies the tools and the workspace. The worker has no real risk of loss from the work and depends on your business as their primary source of income.
Many working relationships fall somewhere in the middle, and that is exactly where the risk lives. A worker who started as a true contractor and gradually became more integrated into daily operations may have crossed the line without anyone making a conscious decision to change the arrangement. The legal exposure accumulates during that drift whether or not anyone recognizes it at the time.
One factor that carries significant weight in both the IRS and Department of Labor analyses is exclusivity. A contractor who works for ten different clients in a year looks very different from one who works exclusively for your business. If your contractor has effectively become dependent on your business as their primary or only source of income, that economic dependence is a factor that cuts toward employee status regardless of what the contract says. Reviewing exclusivity patterns in your contractor relationships is one of the fastest ways to identify which ones carry the most reclassification risk.
The practical question to ask about any contractor relationship is whether the arrangement would survive scrutiny if the worker filed a complaint tomorrow. If the answer is uncertain, that uncertainty is worth resolving before someone else forces the question.
What to Do If You Are Not Sure
If you have workers you have been paying as contractors and you are not certain the classification holds up under the legal tests, getting a clear answer now costs far less than responding to an audit later. A legal review of the actual working relationship, not just the contract, will tell you where you stand and what the exposure looks like if the classification does not hold.
If the relationship is misclassified, there are ways to address it that reduce exposure going forward. Some businesses reclassify workers and document the change. Others restructure the working relationship so it genuinely qualifies as a contractor arrangement. The right path depends on the specific situation, the length of the relationship, and the worker’s own preferences.
Doing nothing because the situation feels uncertain is the most expensive option. The exposure grows with every paycheck while the classification remains unresolved.
A Risk‑Free Strategy Session with OCL is a practical starting point for this conversation. We look at the specific working relationships in your business and give you a plain‑English read on where the classification stands and what, if anything, needs to change.
Book your session at outsidechieflegal.com.
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Our Corporate/Business Counsel Services
Outside Chief Legal LLC is a modern, forward-thinking law firm serving as fractional chief legal officers and outside general counsel for businesses and their owners. With over 200 years of combined litigation, in-house, general counsel, and administrative legal experience, the firm delivers approachable, comprehensive counsel that blends legal expertise with practical business insight to help clients navigate ownership complexities with confidence. OCL is a trusted partner for founders, business owners, and leadership teams nationwide. Learn more about our firm, meet our team, or schedule a Risk-Free Strategy Session to talk with an attorney about how we can help your company.
